Exploring the passage of the health care bill and what it means to America

Exploring the health care bill, global warming, new tax laws and more?

Search This Blog

Pages

Powered By Blogger

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Global Warming Fact or Fiction

Global warming, fact or fiction


Let’s explore global warming science. How much of it is fact? How much of it is fiction?

Scientist have varied in there description of Global warming and most recently began referring to it as climate change? However, the term climate change suggests a simpler definition, such as the never ending, and ever changing climate of our planet. Moreover, does not suggest climate temperatures shifting reliably into one direction, as with the global warming theory. In absolute contrast to the term climate change, Global warming implies permanent increasing temperatures with catastrophic results to our planet that are man made.


I am not scientist, however I am a skeptic. I believe the global warming theory contains a number of inconsistencies concerning the facts.
Fundamentally, the temperature changes on earth, and planets surrounding earth.
Below, is supporting data from NASA and other sources concerning the rise and fall of temperatures of our planet and planets in our solar system. This data represents a correlation between these temperature changes. Remarkable, because of the similarity of temperature changes of our planet at the very same time as the other planets in our solar system. In particular, mars because of its proximity as well as the planets many similarities to our earth.

NASA reported in 2007 that mars and the earth have experienced very similar warming periods at about 0.5C since the 1970s until now. Since there is no known life on mars the warming climate has to be a natural phenomenon. Moreover, keeping in mind that we share the same sun, this is evidence of the suns influences on mars as well as the earth.

Nevertheless, NASA reports the temperature fluctuations on mars are due to winds and several other factors? Not necessarily our suns influences. However, I am skeptical concerning the scientist’s conclusion, as it seems too much of a coincidence?

In addition, reported in 2007 Greenland’s ice sheet from 1958 to 2007 grew by 24% an area equal to the size of Germany. As well as the acknowledgments by Doctor Jones, that earth has not had any statistically significant warming over the last 15 years.

Moreover, evidence that the earth may have been warmer in the medieval times between 800 and 1300 AD continues to filter in. Additionally, scientist report that ice free seas from this warming period allowed the Viking’s to settle in a comfortable warm Greenland where colonies flourished for centuries. This is inconsistent to the so called hockey stick graph of Doctor Jones that depicts relatively stable temperatures for centuries before sharply rising temperatures in recent decades.

Then there are the other so called facts reported by Greenpeace. Doctor Jones of Greenpeace reported in 2007 that all of the ice sheets in the Antarctic would be melted by 2030. Moreover, later in an interview recanted his statement after the interviewer pointed out there is 6.5 million square kilometers of ice in the Antarctica currently, at least 3 kilometers thick.
Doctor Jones defended himself and Greenpeace by stating that Greenpeace was emotionalizing the hypothesis to make people more aware.

Nevertheless, the data represents that warming has occurred over the last 1000 years. However, there is no evidence that supports global warming exist only due to man kind. To the contrary the opposite is more likely.

Our planet has warmed and cooled countless times since its infancy. Moreover, throughout the years has spent much of its history colder as opposed to warmer. In addition, the wild predictions by Doctor Jones and Greenpeace have contributed to even more skepticism regarding global warming.

Recently the history channel had a documentary regarding the past weather of our planet. In which, different scientist’s interpretation of the weather patterns of our planet was presented.
In particular, the mini and major ice age patterns that have followed the earth’s evolution. Moreover, clearly the scientist’s hypothesis included: that even if man were contributing to global warming it would not last. Secondary to the mini ice age and ice age cycles that have dominated our plant for more than fifty thousand years. In fact, they noted that we are currently sprinting toward an ice age cycle, not a warming cycle according weather study patterns.

In conclusion, man made global warming hypothesis is not supported by the entire scientific community. And additionally, will require a great deal more research before irresponsibly stating it as fact as many scientists are now.

No comments:

Post a Comment